City Centre West
ApprovedPrivate Development · 10501 Main Street, Fairfax, VA 22030 · topic history · city record ↗
79 units · 7,731 sq ft retail · 8 stories · 1.78 acres
In plain terms: the project would add roughly 153 residents and about $579k a year in new property tax, but serving those residents costs money too. Depending on how you count the cost of city services for new residents, that nets out anywhere between a net cost of about $173k a year and a net gain of about $351k a year. The strict accounting (every resident carries a full share of today's citywide costs) gives the costlier figure; counting only costs that actually grow with new residents gives the friendlier one. The likely answer sits in between.
Where the effects land
The economic map shows total captured spending by business location and named reporting clusters. The walk map uses a tighter extent around walk-arriving capture and the street segments assigned new resident walk trips; the bike map (when present) shows bike-arriving capture across the city — bikes reach farther, so it spreads wider and thinner. Dollar heatmaps are clipped to CR (Commercial Retail) zoning, and each map is scaled to its own data, so colors are not comparable across maps.
Summary
City Centre West is an approved mixed-use redevelopment of three vacant or underutilized buildings on approximately 1.78 acres along Chain Bridge Road in the City of Fairfax. The proposal replaces 19,469 square feet of existing commercial space with an 8-story building containing up to 79 for-sale condominium units, approximately 7,731 square feet of ground-floor retail and/or restaurant space, and approximately 36,862 square feet of non-retail commercial floor area. This analysis estimates the net annual fiscal impact at −$722,161 to +$884,893, a range that spans both the naive per-capita and marginal cost framings of service expenditure; the wide spread reflects genuine uncertainty about how much of the city's fixed cost base scales with new infill residents. The three assumptions to which these results are most sensitive are the average household size assumed for new condominium units (range: 1.6–2.4 persons per unit), the assessed value per residential unit drawn from comparable condominium sales (range: $443,000–$665,000 per unit), and the student generation rate per unit (range: 0.05–0.16 students per unit).
View metric methods and calculations →
Adjust the assumptions
Every estimate above rests on named assumptions with published ranges. If you have better local knowledge, move the sliders — adjusted values use the exact formulas of the pipeline, bounded by each assumption's sensitivity range. Travel and destination-choice parameters are excluded (they require a full model re-run). Nothing is saved or submitted.
Assumptions
share of proposed units occupied at stabilization
persons per occupied new for-sale condominium unit
for-sale condominium buyers anchor to purchase price rather than rent, drawing incomes further above the area median than new rental does
CES line items are national averages; ±15% covers regional and vintage drift
scales new residents into all-purpose daily walk trips for the foot-traffic flow allocation
existing commercial sqft -> displaced jobs; a higher value yields fewer displaced jobs per sqft
proposed retail sqft -> on-site jobs
median assessed value per unit across 100 condominium-class comps, 25th-75th percentile bounds
assessed $/sqft applied to proposed retail space; refine with commercial comps in a follow-up
assessed $/sqft applied to proposed non-retail commercial space (office, medical, bank). Previously omitted, which valued every proposed office at zero
rough-estimate input: the BPOL base for office tenants
rough-estimate input: the business tangible personal property base across proposed retail and office space
share of the project's own on-site receipts that is NEW to the city (new resident and visitor demand, plus sales recaptured from outside) rather than displaced from existing city businesses; displaced sales move the tax base, they do not add to it
share of the project's ground-floor space occupied by restaurants (the meals-tax base) rather than shop retail
drives the school-cost component when the education transfer and enrollment are pinned (school-split cost model); otherwise informs the school note only
share of the NON-school per-capita cost that scales at the margin (school costs follow the student estimate directly under the school-split model)
rough-estimate input: converts new households to taxable vehicles for the personal property levy
rough-estimate input: average taxable value per vehicle; no project-specific fleet data exists
rough-estimate input: annual gross receipts per sqft for the BPOL base; the low bound absorbs vacancy and lease-up
Requires a full model re-run
These parameters sit inside the travel/destination-choice model, so their effect on the results is not a simple rescaling — they cannot be adjusted live.
Recomputed estimates
Economic
| Metric | Published | Adjusted | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| New households | 76.6 | 76.6 | — |
| New residentsheadline | 153 | 153 | — |
| Aggregate household income | $17.92M | $17.92M | — |
| New annual spending: grocery | $635k | $635k | — |
| New annual spending: restaurant_bar | $611k | $611k | — |
| New annual spending: retail_comparison | $785k | $785k | — |
| New annual spending: retail_convenience | $120k | $120k | — |
| New annual spending: personal_services | $178k | $178k | — |
| New annual spending: entertainment | $667k | $667k | — |
| Annual capture: Fairchester Drive & Hill Street | $831k | $831k | — |
| Annual capture: Chain Bridge Road & North Street | $635k | $635k | — |
| Annual capture: Fair Lakes Parkway & Fair Oaks Mall | $267k | $267k | — |
| Annual capture: Mathy Drive & Pickett Road | $165k | $165k | — |
| Annual capture: Blenheim Boulevard & Fairfax Boulevard | $114k | $114k | — |
| Annual capture: project's own ground-floor retailheadline | $9,770 | $9,770 | — |
| On-site jobs removed (existing space) | 55.6 | 55.6 | — |
| On-site retail jobs added | 15.5 | 15.5 | — |
| On-site office jobs added | 105 | 105 | — |
| Net on-site job change | 65.2 | 65.2 | — |
| New annual spending arriving on footheadline | $318k | $318k | — |
| New annual spending arriving by bike | $35k | $35k | — |
| Spending arriving on foot at project's own retail | $4,820 | $4,820 | — |
| Implied spending per resident walk trip | $6 | $6 | — |
| New resident walk trips per day | 153 | 153 | — |
Fiscal
| Metric | Published | Adjusted | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Projected assessed value | $59.62M | $59.62M | — |
| Projected real estate tax | $639k | $639k | — |
| Real estate tax increaseheadline | $579k | $579k | — |
| Personal property tax on resident vehicles (rough estimate) | $62k | $62k | — |
| BPOL business license tax on project retail (rough estimate) | $1,850 | $1,850 | — |
| BPOL business license tax on project office (rough estimate) | $74k | $74k | — |
| Business tangible property tax (rough estimate) | $15k | $15k | — |
| Meals tax on captured in-city dining | $19k | $19k | — |
| Meals tax on the project's own restaurants (net-new, rough estimate) | $21k | $21k | — |
| Local sales tax share on captured in-city retail | $9,700 | $9,700 | — |
| Local sales tax on the project's own retail (net-new, rough estimate) | $9,248 | $9,248 | — |
| Annual school cost within the service-cost estimates | $158k | $158k | — |
| Annual service cost — naive per-capita method | $963k | $963k | — |
| Annual service cost — marginal framing | $440k | $440k | — |
| Estimated K-12 students | 7.9 | 7.9 | — |
| Net annual fiscal impact — naive per-capita methodheadline | −$173k | −$173k | — |
| Net annual fiscal impact — marginal framingheadline | $351k | $351k | — |
| Net annual fiscal impact (range across both cost methods) | $89k | $89k | — |
Adjusted values are exact recomputations of the model's central estimates for the assumptions above — the same arithmetic the pipeline runs, evaluated in your browser. Published ranges, maps, and the narrative report are not recomputed here.
Full analysis
Project description
The subject property comprises three parcels (PINs 57 4 02 076, 57 4 02 072, and 57 4 02 071) totaling approximately 77,683 square feet, or approximately 1.78 acres, located in the City of Fairfax, Virginia. The site is currently developed with three freestanding buildings: a vacant 3,721 square foot drive-through bank, a vacant 4,408 square foot restaurant, and an 11,340 square foot low-rise office building, for a total existing building area of 19,469 square feet. There are no existing residential units on the site.
The approved proposal, per the July 3, 2023 proffers and narrative (the controlling documents), consists of a single 8-story building of approximately 94 feet in height containing: up to 79 for-sale condominium dwelling units, of which 5 units (representing 6% of the total) are designated affordable; approximately 7,731 square feet of ground-floor retail and/or restaurant uses; and approximately 36,862 square feet of non-retail/restaurant commercial floor area (including office, medical, and bank uses). A partially buried 4-level parking garage will provide 309 parking spaces. The project has been approved. Earlier submissions proposed 84 or 88 units, 324 or 467 parking spaces, and up to 10,024 square feet of retail; the July 2023 documents control on all figures.
Economic effects
New demand. At a stabilized occupancy rate of 0.93–0.99, the 79 proposed units are estimated to yield 73–78 occupied households. Applying Rutgers CUPR residential demographic multipliers for multifamily units by bedroom mix, and assuming 1.6–2.4 persons per occupied unit, the project is projected to bring approximately 118–188 new residents to the city. Aggregate household income for the new resident population is estimated using the mean household income of site census tract 51600300400 ($173,176, from ACS 5-year 2024 data, tables B19025/B11001), scaled by a new-construction income premium of 1.15–1.60 to reflect the tendency of for-sale condominium buyers to anchor to purchase price rather than area rents.
Spending and retail capture. Annual new household spending is estimated by category using BLS Consumer Expenditure Survey 2023 line items, scaled by income using Engel-curve elasticities by category. The largest spending streams are comparison retail ($549,000–$1,082,000/yr), entertainment ($459,000–$936,000/yr), and restaurants and bars ($434,000–$829,000/yr). Grocery spending is estimated at $482,000–$805,000/yr, convenience retail at $89,000–$156,000/yr, and personal services at $126,000–$244,000/yr.
Where spending lands — Huff model capture (screening estimates). The distribution of new resident spending across the area's retail destinations was estimated using a Huff model applied to individual retail points of interest, treating destination choice and travel mode jointly. The model is a screening estimate that ranks where new spending is likely to land and provides sensitivity bounds; it is not a prediction. The top destination clusters in order of modeled annual capture are:
- Fairchester Drive & Hill Street: $606,000–$1,164,000/yr — the leading cluster, driven primarily by grocery and comparison retail capture.
- Chain Bridge Road & North Street: $384,000–$956,000/yr — notable for restaurant/bar and entertainment capture given proximity to the site.
- Fair Lakes Parkway & Fair Oaks Mall: $196,000–$322,000/yr — dominated by comparison retail and entertainment, with no grocery capture modeled.
- Mathy Drive & Pickett Road: $125,000–$211,000/yr — a mixed capture across grocery, comparison retail, and entertainment.
- Blenheim Boulevard & Fairfax Boulevard: $89,000–$140,000/yr — a smaller, distributed capture.
The in-city capture share of all retail spending is estimated at 0.60–0.68 across categories; for food away from home specifically, the in-city share is estimated at 0.64–0.73.
Project's own ground-floor retail. The project's 7,731 square feet of ground-floor retail and/or restaurant space was modeled as a competing destination in the Huff run. Under this screening estimate, the project's own retail is projected to capture $5,656–$13,088/yr of the new residents' spending — a modest share consistent with the ground-floor space competing against a large surrounding retail inventory. This figure is a screening estimate.
Foot-traffic index. The modeled change in the foot-traffic index for the 10 nearest commercial street segments is 0% under the central assumptions. This figure compares exact marginal walk-trip flows from new residents (allocated by shortest paths to POI-weighted destinations with exponential walk-time decay) against a sampled index of today's pedestrian betweenness. The foot-traffic index change is a screening estimate; the baseline is a sampled network index, not calibrated pedestrian counts. New annual spending arriving on foot is estimated at $59,000–$1,430,000/yr, and by bike at $2,000–$216,000/yr; both carry wide ranges because they are driven by the walk- and bike-mode share assumptions.
Jobs ledger. On-site jobs are estimated from floor area using square-feet-per-job ratios. The existing 19,469 square feet of commercial space supports an estimated 39–78 jobs that would be displaced. The proposed development would add an estimated 11–19 retail jobs (from 7,731 sq ft of retail at 400–700 sq ft per job) and 74–147 office jobs (from 36,862 sq ft of office at 250–500 sq ft per job). The net on-site job change is estimated at approximately +7 to +128 jobs, computed as retail jobs added plus office jobs added minus existing jobs removed.
Fiscal effects
Current real estate tax. The three subject parcels currently generate $60,082/yr in real estate tax, computed as the current assessed value multiplied by the applicable rate from the City of Fairfax Real Estate Assessment Database (Patriot WebPro, 2026 vintage) and the FY2027 real estate tax rate.
Projected assessed value and real estate tax. The projected assessed value of $43,915,600–$72,215,300 (central: $59,616,875) is computed as proposed residential units multiplied by an assumed assessed value per unit ($443,000–$665,000/unit, drawn from 100 condominium-class comparable sales in the City's assessment database), plus retail square footage at $200–$400/sq ft, plus office square footage at $200–$450/sq ft. The projected annual real estate tax is $470,995–$774,509/yr (central: $639,391/yr). The real estate tax increase over current — the largest single revenue line — is $410,912–$714,427/yr.
Sanity note from the analysis: the projected assessed value at the central assumption ($59,616,875) is approximately 44% of the stated construction cost basis published in the applicant's April 24, 2023 Fiscal Impact Analysis ($136,330,000). New construction typically assesses at roughly 70–110% of hard cost; figures well outside that range may indicate the assessed value per unit is drawn from a product class that does not match the proposed units. Readers should treat the assessed-value projection as a screening estimate pending actual sales data.
Other recurring revenue lines (all rough estimates unless noted). Additional annual revenues estimated by this analysis include:
- Personal property tax on resident vehicles (rough estimate): $27,309–$116,283/yr, computed as new households multiplied by assumed vehicles per household (1.0–1.8) multiplied by assumed average vehicle assessed value ($9,000–$20,000) multiplied by the City personal property tax rate.
- BPOL business license tax on project retail (rough estimate): $577–$4,629/yr, computed as proposed retail square footage multiplied by assumed gross sales per square foot ($250–$600/sq ft) multiplied by the BPOL retail rate, multiplied by a net-new share (0.15–0.50) to remove receipts displaced from existing city businesses.
- BPOL business license tax on project office (rough estimate): $44,234–$117,958/yr, computed as proposed office square footage multiplied by assumed gross receipts per square foot ($300–$800/sq ft) multiplied by the BPOL professional/financial services rate. This line is not displacement-adjusted, as professional and medical practices are assumed to serve regional demand.
- Business tangible property tax (rough estimate): $7,367–$27,625/yr, computed as proposed commercial square footage multiplied by assumed equipment value per square foot ($4–$15/sq ft) multiplied by the City personal property tax rate.
- Meals tax on captured in-city dining: $12,454–$27,364/yr, computed as the restaurant spending of new households multiplied by the in-city capture share from the Huff model and the City meals tax rate.
- Meals tax on the project's own restaurants (rough estimate): $3,894–$72,904/yr, computed as ground-floor square footage multiplied by assumed sales per square foot, multiplied by an assumed restaurant share of retail space (0.30–0.70), multiplied by the meals tax rate and the net-new share.
- Local sales tax share on captured in-city retail: $6,676–$13,803/yr, computed as the in-city captured retail spending from the Huff model multiplied by the local-option sales tax share under Va. Code § 58.1-605.
- Local sales tax on the project's own retail (rough estimate): $2,884–$23,145/yr, computed as ground-floor square footage multiplied by assumed sales per square foot, multiplied by the local sales tax share and the net-new share.
Service cost — two methods. This analysis estimates service costs under two framings that bound the likely true cost, and both ranges are reported because neither is definitive for an infill project:
- Naive per-capita method: $696,444–$1,238,469/yr. Computed as new residents multiplied by the non-school General Fund expenditure per resident ($5,254/capita, derived from the FY2027 adopted budget), plus estimated K-12 students (4–13, central: 8, at 0.05–0.16 students per unit) multiplied by the net local cost per pupil ($19,961, derived from the FY2027 school tuition contract net of state education revenue). This framing allocates fixed citywide costs to new residents and likely overstates the true marginal cost of infill development.
- Marginal framing: $233,244–$794,693/yr. Computed as the non-school per-capita cost multiplied by a marginal cost factor of 0.25–0.55 (central: 0.35), plus the same student cost as above. The marginal factor reflects that fixed services such as roads and administration do not scale proportionally with additional infill residents. This framing likely understates costs if service capacity expansions are triggered.
School costs — estimated at $78,844–$252,301/yr — are identical in both framings, driven by the student generation assumption.
Net annual fiscal impact. Combining all revenue lines with the cost range across both methods, the net annual fiscal impact is estimated at −$722,161 to +$884,893/yr. Under the naive per-capita method alone the central estimate is −$172,656/yr (range: −$722,161 to +$421,693); under the marginal framing alone the central estimate is +$350,727/yr (range: −$278,385 to +$884,893). The sign of the result is genuinely uncertain under the naive framing: at unfavorable combinations of assumptions the project costs more in services than it generates in revenue, while under the marginal framing the central estimate is positive. The range across methods is intentional and reflects a real policy question about how much of the city's fixed cost base should be allocated to new infill residents.
Comparison with published external estimates. Two external estimates have been published and are reported here as published; they are not combined with the figures above.
- The applicant's April 24, 2023 Fiscal Impact Analysis (Ox Hill Research & Analytics) states: "The overall fiscal impact to the City of Fairfax ranges from $1,627,000 to $2,162,000 of new tax revenues on an annual basis." This range does not overlap with this analysis's range of −$722,161 to +$884,893. The methodological reasons for the gap visible in the respective methods include: the applicant analysis appears to characterize the fiscal impact as new tax revenues without deducting service costs in a comparable way; the applicant analysis was prepared for an earlier design iteration (84–88 units) with a larger program than the controlling 79-unit proffer; and the applicant analysis may use different assessed-value and income assumptions. The two estimates should be read as independent and the reader should compare them directly.
- The City of Fairfax Community Development & Planning staff reports (June 26, 2023 Planning Commission and July 11, 2023 City Council) both state: "[T]he anticipated fiscal impact estimate for the proposed redevelopment project ranges from $543,000 and $741,000 annually with an average of $642,000." This range does overlap with the upper portion of this analysis's range of −$722,161 to +$884,893. The staff range falls within the marginal-framing portion of this analysis's output; methodological differences likely include the staff report's cost assumptions and the specific revenue lines selected.
Not evaluated in this version
Bike-lane corridor effects, trail connectivity, broader pedestrian-network connectivity impacts, environmental impacts, and comparable-places analyses were not computed in this version of the analysis and are deferred to future modules. Additionally, the two fiscal impact analyses prepared by the applicant (Ox Hill Research & Analytics, January 2022 and September 2022) are referenced in the project record but could not be verified against verbatim document quotes and were therefore excluded from the external-estimate comparison; only the April 24, 2023 analysis has been included as a published external estimate.
Method notes & caveats
- Huff capture is a screening estimate computed per business location (every retail POI is an individual destination) and aggregated to named areas for reporting; it ranks where new spending is likely to land, with sensitivity bounds — it is not a prediction.
- The project's own retail is included as a competing destination; its capture estimates how much of the residents' spending the ground floor itself can hold on to.
- Displaced use: Three existing freestanding buildings: a vacant drive-through bank, a vacant restaurant, and a low-rise office building. Any spending that originated on-site today is assumed negligible relative to the new residential demand.
- Bike-arriving capture models cycling as a third mode alongside walking and driving: the bike preference is taken from the drive remainder (walk shares are unchanged), and bikes reach ~3-4x the walking distance per minute of travel time.
- Foot-traffic flows are exact allocations of the new residents' modeled walk trips; the % comparison uses a sampled index of today's walkers, not calibrated pedestrian counts.
- Walk-in capture per business is the walk-arriving share of the NEW residents' spending under a joint destination-and-mode choice: walking competes with driving per destination, so businesses beyond practical walking range receive effectively none of it and the rest of the spending arrives by car. It is not total pedestrian commerce. Comparing a business's walk-in capture to its total capture shows how much of its projected gain depends on being within walking distance of the project.
- assessment sources disagree on 3 parcel(s): WebPro $5,602,100 vs bulk parcel layer $6,983,300 (20%); WebPro is used as the assessment database of record
- Personal property tax is a rough estimate: the city rate is pinned, but vehicles per household and average vehicle value are assumptions, not observed data. Pinning per-household budget actuals would replace this estimate.
- On-site commercial tax lines exclude $9,770/yr of new-resident spending at the project's own ground floor, which is already counted in full in the resident-capture lines.
- BPOL revenue is a rough estimate: the city rate schedule is pinned, but tenant gross receipts are assumed from a sales-per-sqft range.
- School costs use the split model: 8 students (4-13) x $19,961 net local cost per pupil ≈ $157,688/yr in both cost framings — a development generating fewer students carries proportionally lower costs instead of the school-heavy citywide average.
- The net fiscal range spans both cost framings on purpose: the naive per-capita method overstates costs for infill (it allocates fixed citywide costs to new residents); the marginal framing understates them if service capacity expansions are triggered.
- The revenue side includes the rough-estimate personal property and BPOL lines: leaving them at zero would understate revenue for taxes the city does levy, but both carry wide assumption-driven bounds.
- BENCHMARK: this analysis puts the net annual fiscal impact at $-722,161 to $884,893; the applicant fiscal impact analysis states $1,627,000 to $2,162,000. The ranges do NOT overlap — the methods disagree on the sign or scale of the result, and the reader should compare them directly. External figures are reported as published, never merged into the estimates above.
- BENCHMARK: this analysis puts the net annual fiscal impact at $-722,161 to $884,893; the city staff report states $543,000 to $741,000. The ranges overlap. External figures are reported as published, never merged into the estimates above.
- SANITY: the projected assessed value ($59,616,875) is 44% of the stated construction cost basis ($136,330,000). New construction typically assesses at roughly 70-110% of hard cost, so a figure far outside that band usually means the assessed value per unit is drawn from the wrong product class — review `residential_value_per_unit`.
Data sources
- City project directory record · 2026-07-18
- Project document: July 3, 2023 Narrative (PDF, 232KB) · current
- Project document: July 3, 2023 General Development Plan Sheets 1-26 (PDF, 18MB) · current
- Project document: July 3, 2023 General Development Plan Sheets 27-54 (PDF, 20MB) · current
- Project document: July 3, 2023 Proffers (PDF, 176KB) · current
- Project document: July 3, 2023 Transportation Impact Study (PDF, 22MB) · current
- Project document: July 3, 2023 Transportation Impact Study Technical Appendix (PDF, 12MB) · current
- Project document: June 13, 2023 BAR Sheets 1-8 (PDF, 10MB) · current
- Project document: June 13, 2023 BAR Sheets 9-15 (PDF, 15MB) · current
- Project document: June 13, 2023 BAR Sheets 16-23 (PDF, 28MB) · current
- Project document: June 13, 2023 BAR Sheets 24-28 (PDF, 2MB) · current
- Project document: June 13, 2023 BAR Sheets 29-63 (PDF, 4MB) · current
- Project document: June 13, 2023 BAR Sheets 64-107 (PDF, 13MB) · current
- Project document: June 5, 2023 Narrative (PDF, 369KB) · current
- Project document: June 5, 2023 General Development Plan Sheets 1-13 (PDF, 11MB) · current
- Project document: June 5, 2023 General Development Plan Sheets 14-22 (PDF, 7MB) · current
- Project document: June 5, 2023 General Development Plan Sheets 23-33 (PDF, 10MB) · current
- Project document: June 5, 2023 General Development Plan Sheets 34-40 (PDF, 9MB) · current
- Project document: June 5, 2023 General Development Plan Sheets 41-46 (PDF, 4MB) · current
- Project document: June 5, 2023 General Development Plan Sheets 47-52 (PDF, 12MB) · current
- Project document: June 5, 2023 Proffers (PDF, 365KB) · current
- Project document: June 5, 2023 Transportation Impact Study (PDF, 23MB) · current
- Project document: June 5, 2023 Transportation Impact Study Technical Appendix (PDF, 12MB) · current
- Project document: May 11, 2023 BAR Submission 2 Sheets 1-22 (PDF, 21MB) · current
- Project document: May 11, 2023 BAR Submission 2 Sheets 23-58 (PDF, 4MB) · current
- Project document: May 11, 2023 BAR Submission 2 Sheets 59-73 (PDF, 4MB) · current
- Project document: May 11, 2023 BAR Submission 2 Sheets 74-95 (PDF, 5MB) · current
- Project document: April 24, 2023 Narrative (PDF, 200KB) · current
- Project document: April 24, 2023 General Development Plan 1-22 (PDF, 18MB) · current
- Project document: April 24, 2023 General Development Plan 23-34 (PDF, 12MB) · current
- Project document: April 24, 2023 General Development Plan 35-50 (PDF, 21MB) · current
- Project document: April 24, 2023 Transportation Impact Study (PDF, 23MB) · current
- Project document: April 24, 2023 Fiscal Impact Analysis (PDF, 761KB) · current
- Project document: October 24, 2022 BAR Submission 1 (PDF, 7MB) · current
- Project document: September 1, 2022 Narrative (PDF, 203KB) · current
- Project document: September 1, 2022 Master Development Plan Sheet 1-21 (PDF, 17MB) · current
- Project document: September 1, 2022 Master Development Plan Sheet 22-36 (PDF, 27MB) · current
- Project document: September 1, 2022 Fiscal Impact Analysis (PDF, 2MB) · current
- Project document: January 24, 2022 Narrative (PDF, 200KB) · current
- Project document: January 24, 2022 Master Development Plan (PDF, 29MB) · current
- Project document: January 24, 2022 Certified Plat (PDF, 448KB) · current
- Project document: January 24, 2022 Fiscal Impact Analysis Report (PDF, 4MB) · current
- Project document: March 18, 2019 Fairfax City Center West Summary (PDF, 139KB) · current
- Project documents (extracted spec) · current
- Rutgers CUPR residential demographic multipliers (Listokin et al. 2006), multifamily · 2006
- Census ACS 5-yr 2024 (B19025/B11001, site tract) · 2024
- BLS Consumer Expenditure Survey 2023, average annual expenditures per consumer unit · 2023 · line items: grocery: Food at home; restaurant_bar: Food away from home; retail_comparison: Apparel and services + household furnishings and equipment; retail_convenience: Personal care products and services (products share); personal_services: Personal services incl. laundry/cleaning, haircare services; entertainment: Entertainment; income scaling uses per-category expenditure elasticities grocery=0.45, restaurant_bar=0.85, retail_comparison=0.95, retail_convenience=0.6, personal_services=0.9, entertainment=1.05 (Engel gradients per CE quintile tables)
- Derived: new residents x NHTS walking trip rate · 2022
- OpenStreetMap walk network + ACS population + merged POI layer · current · exact shortest-path flow allocation; baseline sampled betweenness k=2000, seeded
- City of Fairfax Real Estate Assessment Database (Patriot WebPro) · 2026 · parcels 57 4 02 076, 57 4 02 072, 57 4 02 071
- City real estate tax rate · FY2027
- City of Fairfax Real Estate Assessment Database (Patriot WebPro), condominium comps built since 2011 · 2026 · 100 condominium comps: acct 702536 ($592,000/unit); acct 702537 ($721,900/unit); acct 702538 ($701,100/unit); acct 702539 ($581,200/unit); acct 702540 ($702,900/unit); acct 702541 ($583,500/unit); acct 702542 ($701,100/unit); acct 702543 ($581,200/unit); acct 702544 ($705,300/unit); acct 702545 ($581,200/unit); acct 702546 ($701,100/unit); acct 702547 ($596,200/unit); ... and 88 more
- City personal property tax rate · FY2027 (rate unchanged; also FY2024 Rates & Levies, code 311210) · PPTRA car-tax relief is a fixed state block grant, so marginal vehicles yield the city the full levy
- City BPOL rate schedule (budget Rates & Levies) · FY2024 adopted (Rates & Levies — retail sales all types) · retail-sales rate applied to the whole space; the repair/personal/business-services classification is taxed at $0.27 per $100, slightly above the retail rate
- City BPOL rate schedule (budget Rates & Levies) · FY2024 adopted (Rates & Levies, acct 312012 — "Financial and Professional Services $0.40 per $100 gross receipts"). Medical, legal and financial office tenants fall in this class; repair/personal/business services are $0.27 · professional/business-services class rate
- City business tangible property tax rate · FY2024 adopted (Rates & Levies, acct 311210 — "Personal Property Tax $4.13 per $100 market value"). The schedule sets no separate business-tangible class, so business equipment is taxed at the single personal property rate
- City meals tax rate · FY2027
- Local-option sales tax share · statutory (Va. Code § 58.1-605)
- City General Fund budget + school tuition contract · FY2027 · non-school: ($207,912,496 - $76,429,791) / 25,026 residents = $5,254 per capita; schools: ($76,429,791 tuition - $14,492,271 state education revenue) / 3,103 students = $19,961 net local cost per pupil (FY2027 adopted (Education page — FCPS tuition contract, final tuition bill estimate))
- Rutgers CUPR residential demographic multipliers (Listokin et al. 2006), high-rise multifamily · 2006
- applicant fiscal impact analysis: April 24, 2023 Fiscal Impact Analysis (applicant/Ox Hill Research & Analytics) · as published · stated: "The overall fiscal impact to the City of Fairfax ranges from $1,627,000 to $2,162,000 of new tax revenues on an annual basis."
- city staff report: July 11, 2023 City Council Public Hearing – Staff Report (City of Fairfax, Community Development & Planning) · as published · stated: "The anticipated fiscal impact estimate for the proposed redevelopment project ranges from $543,000 and $741,000 annually with an average of $642,000."
Computed Aug 26, 2026 · narrative by claude-sonnet-4-6 over deterministic model output (v3)