Park Rd - Townhomes

Proposal at a glance

Tax map parcel(s): 57 1 44 008, 57 1 44 009, 57 1 44 010, 57 1 44 007, 57 1 44 006, 57 1 44 005, 57 1 44 004, 57 1 44 003, 57 1 44 002, 57 1 44 001, 57 1 44 011, 57 1 44 012, 57 1 44 000 A, 57 1 44 013

Extracted from the city's submitted documents; each figure traces to the text it came from.

• Dwelling units (existing) — "Rezone the 1.18 acre site from CR Commercial Retail zoning district"
• Dwelling units (proposed) — "PROPOSED TOWNHOME UNITS 13"
• Stories (proposed) — "13 three story, 2 car garage townhomes on 1.18 acres"
• Parking spaces (proposed) — "PROPOSED SPACES 26 SPACES"
• Site area (proposed) — "LOT AREA 1.16 AC (50,778 SF)"

Official record

The applicant is proposing to build 13 three story, 2 car garage townhomes on 1.18 acres.

• Requests: Rezone the 1.18 acre site from CR Commercial Retail zoning district to the RT Residential Townhouse zoning district. Special Exception to Section 4.5.6.B pertaining to Street trees and 10-foot landscape strip along the private street. Special Exception to Section 3.6.1 pertaining to required yard setbacks
• Address: 11006 Park Rd, Fairfax, VA 22030
• Applicant: Caglayan Investment Group Keith Martin The Law Office of Keith C. Martin PLLC
• City record

2026-06-09 — City Council Meeting

• Final site plan approved with sidewalk proffer.

Open questions

No unresolved questions recorded.

Member commentary

No recorded member positions yet.

Screening-level estimates of the economic and fiscal effects of Park Rd Townhomes. Figures are decision-support context with named assumptions and sensitivity ranges — not predictions. The full analysis has the interactive assumptions panel and maps; methods documents every formula.

Headline estimates

• New residents: 22.2 (range 17.6 – 27.7) — households x persons per multifamily unit (Rutgers CUPR bedroom-mix multipliers)
• Annual capture: project's own ground-floor retail: $0 — Huff model over individual retail POIs: joint destination+mode choice, P(j,m) ~ A_j * w_m * exp(-b_m t_mj), CES category spend; clusters are a reporting rollup; own retail competes as a destination
• New annual spending arriving on foot: $39k (range $6,834 – $181k) — walk-mode share of the joint destination+mode Huff choice, summed over businesses; walking loses to driving with walk time, so the remainder of the mode-split budget arrives by car
• Net annual fiscal impact — naive per-capita method: −$74k (range −$120k – −$17k) — incremental new recurring revenue minus service cost (upper-bound cost framing; allocates fixed citywide costs)
• Net annual fiscal impact — marginal framing: $2,360 (range −$54k – $52k) — incremental new recurring revenue minus service cost (only services that scale with new residents)

Method notes, caveats, and non-headline metrics live on the analysis page.