City Council Special Meeting: Budget Adoption

Catherine Readby voiceGood evening. I would like to call the special meeting of May 5th, 2026 to order. because this is a special meeting we are only going to include action items there will be no general public comment at tonight's meeting I would like to acknowledge that this week from May 3rd through 9th is public service week and with that mission berry okay

Melissa Shinaberryclerkby voicewe only have one public hearing item and as a public hearing on appropriation resolutions for the general capital wastewater, transit, stormwater, cable, Old Town, transportation tax, and debt service funds for FY27 budget year. This will be a council consideration as agenda item 3G. I'm going to recognize JC Martinez, our assistant city manager, chief financial officer, to provide the staff presentation.

JC MartinezstaffGood evening, Mayor and Council. appropriation resolutions are needed for the general capital wastewater transit stormwater utility cable Old Town transportation tax and debt service funds in order to implement the FY 2027 budget the amounts contained in the attached staff reports and resolutions are pending approval of the final FY 27 budget adoption which is scheduled on the agenda to be item 3g

Billy BatesI

Stacey Hardy-Chandlerwill

Catherine Readby voiceopen the public hearing miss Shinneberry has this public hearing been advertised all

Stacey Hardy-Chandlerright

Catherine Readby voicedo we have any speaker signed up is there anyone in the not sign up we ask that speakers provide their address or residents can fill out a speaker slip is is there anyone who would like to speak come forward you have three minutes

David Gellerpublic commentthank you david geller 10305 derby street and i'm sorry for the late appearance here about all of this, but all I have to say is I'm totally against raising the tax rate, okay, totally, the real estate tax rate. I mean, our real estate taxes go up automatically if the price of the homes go up, which it's doing, so that should keep pace with inflation, and the fact that we're raising it more since last time we did, and now again, I'm just totally against realize the real problem is spending more than we have, and I'm against that too. I mean, I just think we should live within our budget. Also, raising the restaurant tax, I know it's only a small amount. That's really not the point. The point is I really just am against keep raising the taxes, the rates, okay?

The taxes themselves go up. The revenues do go up so far. But raising the rates is just on top of everything. I mean, a restaurant, I mean, if there's anyone, I'm sure you've all gone to restaurants, look what it costs already just to eat at a restaurant. Raising a little more certainly isn't going to help either the person eating there or the owners of the restaurant, okay? Fewer people will go, and I just think that's bad. So that's all I have to say. I don't know. I'm sure you're all trying your best, but I just looked at the budget and went through it all. A lot of things I don't understand. so I do want to get clarification as time goes on, but I'm just giving you my opinion about the current state of the budget,

the taxes, and everything else. And I enjoy Fairfax City. I think it's a great place, and I'd like to keep the cost for the, you know, the people have to pay as low as possible. And I'm glad it's been low so far. I mean, it's been rising, but we have to keep it from rising. That's my whole point. It's just now so easy. Oh, let's just add another quarter point here, another half percent here. And now they want to add one and a half percent for the real estate. I mean, I'm just totally against it. Thanks a lot.

Melissa Shinaberryclerkby voiceIs there anybody else in the room that would like to speak on the appropriation resolutions for FY27 budget year?

Catherine Readby voiceAll right. I will close the public hearing. Council action will be incorporated into agenda item number 3G.

Melissa Shinaberryclerkby voiceOur first item under items not requiring a public hearing is a consideration of an ordinance amending and readopting Chapter 90, Article 2, Division 1, Section 90-33 of the Code of the City of Fairfax, Virginia, pertaining to classification taxation of certain real property in the City of Fairfax used for or zoned for commercial and industrial purposes and to establish a separate tax rate on such real property effective as of January 1, 2026, revenue from which would be used exclusively for transportation purposes that benefit the City of Fairfax. I'll recognize J.C. Martinez, our Assistant City Manager, Chief Financial Officer, to provide the staff report.

JC MartinezstaffThank you. Mayor, Council, Section 58.1-3221.3 of the Code of Virginia was adopted as part of the transportation bill enacted during the 2007 session of the General Assembly. The enacted legislation granted local authority to the city and other eligible jurisdictions to impose a separate real estate tax on commercial and industrial property, revenue from which shall be used exclusively for transportation purposes that benefit the city city council can adopt a rate between zero cents all the way to twelve and a half cents however no formal council action on the item would result in the rate reverting to zero cents the attached ordinance would set the 2026 tax years rate to twelve and a half cents per hundred

dollars of assessed valuation no change from 2025 tax year and would be applicable to all affected real property as of January 1, 2026. The proposed 2026 rate of 12 and a half cents per $100 of assessed value is the maximum rate allowed by the Code of Virginia approximately 2.6 million dollars at the proposed rate will be generated from that amount happy to answer any questions are

Catherine Readby voicethere questions of staff seeing none is there a motion councilmember

Stacey Hardy-ChandlerHardy Chandler I move to approve an ordinance readopting chapter 90 article 2 division 1 section 90-33 of the code of the city of Virginia pertaining to the classification and taxation of certain real property in the city of Fairfax used for or zoned for commercial and industrial purposes. Such ordinance shall include a tax rate for such real property for calendar year 2026 of 12.5 cents per $100 of assessed value, revenues from which will be used exclusively for transportation purposes that benefit the city of Fairfax.

Catherine Readby voiceSecond. Councilmember Hardy-Chandler and seconded by Councilmember Peterson. Is there any discussion on the motion? Seeing none, a roll call vote.

Melissa Shinaberryclerkby voiceCouncilmember McQuillan? Aye. Councilmember Bates? Aye. Councilmember Peterson? Aye. Councilmember Hardy-Chandler? Aye. Councilmember Hall? Aye. Councilmember Amos? Aye. Motion passed unanimously. Go on to the next item, which is a consideration of an ordinance amending Chapter 102, Article 2, 102-31 in parens B of the Code of the City of Fairfax, Virginia, to increase the wastewater utility rate by 6% for FY27. I'll recognize JC Martinez, our Assistant City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, to provide a staff report.

JC MartinezstaffThank you. Mayor, Council, in conjunction with the City's financial advisors and consulting engineers, a wastewater utility multi-year financial and capital planning analysis had been developed. the primary goal of the analysis was to create a comprehensive cash flow planning model taking into account existing and projected operating and capital needs while minimizing rate increases for existing customers based on the analysis staff recommends a user rate increase of 6% in the city's wastewater utility the city raised rates to 10% in 2014 through 2020 28% in 21 and then 6% from FY 22 through FY 26. Increased residential and commercial wastewater user rates are required to fund the city's increasing costs associated with its aging infrastructure within the city and to cover

the increasing costs associated with aging infrastructure at the Nomen coal wastewater treatment plant, also known as the plant. major plant upgrades are necessary necessitated by stringent federal regulations designed to improve wastewater treatment and quality the critical plant construction and renovation projects needed to replace and improve aging infrastructure happy to answer any questions thank

Catherine Readby voiceyou mr. Martinez are there any questions of staff councilmember Hall

Stacy Hallthank you sorry annoying to hear me and I apologize. Do we have any idea how much these like forever chemicals are going to cost us moving forward? Has there been any sort of analysis done by the Nomenclan with regard to where they've given us ten years out at this time?

JC MartinezstaffI heard forever chemicals but I might have been mistaken in what you said. Is that?

Stacy HallYeah like the PFAS the ones that are in turf and those kind of things.

JC MartinezstaffI do not have that information this is something that back to Council regarding either Satoshi Ito or Public Works Director Dave Summers and we can get that back to you. As explained during one of the work sessions, the outlook for the ten years is over $100 million in capital improvements specifically associated to the Nomen coal plant.

Stacy HallYou mentioned the federal regulations and it made me wonder if some of those have been considered or not yet. So I should have asked it earlier but it didn't come to me earlier. So thank you.

Catherine Readby voiceany other questions of staff okay is there a motion councilmember Hardy Chandler I

Stacey Hardy-Chandlermove to approve an ordinance amending and readopting chapter 102 article 2 section 102-31 B of the code of the city of Fairfax Virginia to increase the rates for wastewater services by 6%

Thomas Petersonsecond

Catherine Readby voicea motion has been made by councilmember Hardy Chandler and seconded by councilmember Peterson is on the motion seeing none a roll call vote

Melissa Shinaberryclerkby voicecouncilmember Amos

Catherine Readby voiceaye

Melissa Shinaberryclerkby voicecouncil member Hall aye council member Hardy Chandler aye council member Peterson aye council member Bates council member council member McClellan aye motion passed unanimously the next item is a consideration of an ordinance amending chapter 102 article 5 section 102-203 in Prince B of the Code of the City of Fairfax, Virginia, to set the rate for stormwater utility service furnished by the city at $36.02 per BU in Prince billing unit, a 5% increase. I'm going to recognize JC Martinez, our assistant city manager and chief financial officer, to provide the staff report.

JC MartinezstaffThank you again, Mayor, Council. The city stormwater utility fund's initial rate of $28.80 per billable unit was set at the time when the stormwater utility was created in December 14th, 2021. Since its establishment, the annual rate increase has averaged 6%. However, the proposed adjustment for calendar year 2026 reflects a modest increase of 5%. The action is to set the rate at $36.02 per billable unit for the calendar year beginning January 1, 2026. The expected user fees which will be generated from this increase are approximately $3.4 million, or roughly an increase of $162,000 from the previous year. Happy to answer any questions.

Catherine Readby voiceAre there questions of staff on this item? Seeing none, is there a motion, Council Member Hardy-Chandler?

Stacey Hardy-ChandlerI move to approve an ordinance amending and readopting Chapter 102, Article 5, Section 102-203B, setting the rate per billing unit to be used in calculating the stormwater utility fee for the calendar year beginning January 1, 2026 at $36.02. Second.

Catherine Readby voiceA motion has been made by Council Member Hardy-Chandler and seconded by Council Member Peterson. Is there any discussion on the motion? Seeing none, a roll call vote.

Melissa Shinaberryclerkby voiceCouncil Member McQuillan? Aye. Council Member Bates? Aye. Council Member Peterson? Aye. Council Member Hardy-Chandler? Aye. Council Member Hall? Aye. Council Member Amos? Aye. Motion passed unanimously. Next item, which is a consideration on an ordinance amending Chapter 90 in Parence Taxation, Article 6 in Parence Tax on Meals, Section 90-262 of the Code of the City of Fairfax, Virginia, pertaining to a proposed increase in the levy and the amount of tax on meals. I'm going to recognize J.C. Martinez, our Assistant City Manager, Chief Financial Officer, to provide the staff report.

JC MartinezstaffThank you. Mayor, Council, Section 90-262 of the City Code. currently provides for a 4% meals tax. The proposed ordinance would increase the amount of the meals tax to 4.5% as set forth in the city manager's recommended FY27 budget. The effective date of this change would be July 1, 2026. The previous meals tax change was from 2% to 4% in 2004, over 22 years ago. An increase in the meals tax reduces the financial burden on residents as the meals tax can offset the need for higher real estate taxes due to visitors and non-residents paying this tax. The half percent proposed increase would generate approximately an additional $1.3 million in meals tax revenues. This change would result in a tax increase of approximately 25 cents to a $50 meal.

Happy to answer any questions.

Catherine Readby voicequestions of staff councilmember Amos

Anthony Amosno questions just reiterating comment I've said before as we move forward just keeping an eye out once we get the 1% sales tax how that can accumulate and stack in the future so just keeping that in mind

Catherine Readby voiceany other questions about this okay is there a motion councilmember Hardy Chandler I

Stacey Hardy-Chandlermove to approve an ordinance amending chapter 90 article 6 section 9D-262 of the Code of the City of Fairfax, Virginia, pertaining to the levy and amount of the meals tax. I further move to set the meals tax rate for the City of Fairfax at 4.5% effective July 1,

Catherine Readby voice2026. Second. Motion has been made by Council Member Hardy-Chandler and seconded by Council Member Peterson. Is there any discussion on the motion? Council Member McQuillan.

Rachel McQuillenI will not be supporting the meals tax increase tonight. Earlier today, I shared with council a newly completed regional report on food system resilience in Fairfax City. While I know you've just received it, the findings are important and directly relevant to this discussion. The report makes clear that food insecurity in our region is not only real, it's growing and becoming more severe. Estimates show up to 26% of residents are experiencing food insecurity, and the number of households facing the most severe levels have increased year over year. At the same time, the cost of living continues to rise. A family of four in our region now needs over $100,000 annually just to meet basic needs, including food.

Importantly, the report highlights that our food system is fragile, dependent on long shared supply chains. Interruptions can quickly impact access and affordability. So when we talk about a meals tax, we are talking about a tax directly connected to food at a time when both affordability and access are already under pressure. I fully support fiscal responsibility in a balanced budget, but I do not believe this is the right place or the right time to increase this particular tax. And for those reasons, I will be voting no. Thank you.

Catherine Readby voiceAny other questions? Discussion on the motion? Seeing none, a roll call vote.

Melissa Shinaberryclerkby voiceCouncil Member Amos?

Catherine Readby voiceAye.

Melissa Shinaberryclerkby voiceCouncil Member Hall? No. Council Member Hardy-Chandler? Aye. Council Member Peterson? Aye. Council Member Bates?

Billy BatesAye.

Melissa Shinaberryclerkby voiceCouncil Member McQuillan?

Billy BatesNo.

Melissa Shinaberryclerkby voiceMotion passed 4-2. We'll go to the next item, which is a consideration on an ordinance to amend Chapter 90 in Perrin's Taxation, Article 7 in Perrin's Transient Occupancy Tax, Section 90-302 of the Code of to a proposed increase in the levy and rate of the transient occupancy tax. I'll recognize JC Martinez, Assistant City Manager, Chief Financial Officer, to provide the staff report.

JC MartinezstaffThank you again, Mayor of Council. Section 90-302 of the City Code currently establishes a transit occupancy tax, also known as a TOT. Currently, the rate is at 4%. The proposed ordinance would increase the TOT rate to 10.5% effective July 1, 2026. An increase in the TOT shifts a portion of the tax burden from residents to visitors and other non-residents, thereby helping to mitigate the need for higher real estate taxes. The proposed 6.5% increase would generate approximately an additional $812,500 in TOT revenues. Each 1% equals about $125,000. Happy to answer any questions. Are there any questions

Catherine Readby voiceof staff? Councilmember Amos.

Anthony AmosNo questions. Just reiterating again, I know we had extensive conversation on this last week, and I think we got to a good place, even though I would have preferred under 10. The only thing I'll ask is that, assuming this gets approved, monitoring the impact on hotels, and if it's proving to be significant, having a plan to provide support when necessary.

Catherine Readby voiceQuestions or comments for the staff on this? Okay. Is there a motion,

Stacey Hardy-ChandlerCouncil Member Hardy-Chandler? I move to adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 14, Businesses, Article 2, Licenses, Division 2, Classification of Certain Businesses of the Code of the City of Fairfax. That's the wrong motion. One to four.

Speaker 9It

Thomas Petersonwas item E.

Rachel McQuillen3E.

Stacey Hardy-ChandlerI will start again. I move that the City Council approve the attached ordinance amending Chapter 90, Taxation, Article 7, Transient Occupancy Tax, Section 90-302, pertaining to the levy and rate of the same.

Catherine Readby voiceIs there

Stacey Hardy-Chandlera second?

Catherine Readby voiceSecond. A motion has been made by Council Member Hardy-Chandler and seconded by Council Member Peterson. Is there a discussion on the motion? Council Member Hall.

Stacy HallI just want to read a little bit of what I wrote to some of the hotels that reached out today. Again, it's not painful for me. I know it's painful for you, so I'm really sorry. There were some other things that I said, but I ended with it is also important to recognize that this is a change being considered within the context of the upcoming budget cycle. While decisions made now set direction, they are not necessarily permanent, and there may be future opportunities to revisit the structure if continues change conditions change or if unintended unintended consequences emerge at this stage only time will fully reveal the long-term impact so we do hear you and we will be following up with this but unfortunately i think

right now it's something that we do need thank you

Catherine Readby voiceuh any other discussion on this motion Seeing none, a roll call vote.

Melissa Shinaberryclerkby voiceCouncil Member McQuillan? Aye. Council Member Bates?

Billy BatesAye.

Melissa Shinaberryclerkby voiceCouncil Member Peterson? Aye. Council Member Hardy-Chandler? Aye. Council Member Hall? Aye. Council Member Amos? Aye. Motion passed unanimously. We'll go to the next item, which is a consideration on an ordinance amending Chapter 14, M-Paren Businesses, Article 2, M-Paren's Licenses, Division 2, M-Paren's Classification of Certain Businesses of the Code of the City of Fairfax. Virginia pertains to a proposed increase to the levy of annual license taxes on certain business classifications. I recognize JC Martinez our assistant city manager and chief financial officer for the staff report.

JC MartinezstaffThank you again mayor counsel section 14 dash 73 of the city code currently provides a rate of 40 cents per 100 dollars of gross receipts related to annual license taxes for every person engaged in financial services, real estate services, or professional services. The proposed ordinance would increase the amount of the annual license tax to 45 cents per $100 of gross receipts, matching the average Northern Virginia localities. Again, the state maximum allowed rate is 58 cents per $100 of gross receipts. section 14-74 of the city code currently provides for a rate of 27 cents per $100 of gross receipts related to annual license taxes for every person engaged in repair services personal service business service or any other business trade profession occupation or calling

not specifically listed or exempted from license taxation according to the provision of this article The proposed ordinance would increase the amount of the annual license tax to $0.30 per $100 of gross receipts, matching the average Northern Virginia localities. The state maximum allowed rate is $0.36 per $100 of gross receipts. The effective date of the change would be January 1, 2027. The city's business and professional license also known as B-POL tax rates have remained unchanged for more than 30 years. The proposed B-POL rate increases are projected to generate approximately $809,000 in additional annual revenue. A five cent increase of the professional real estate and financial rate would generate about $450,000.

A 3 cent increase to the services rate would generate about $360,000. Happy to answer any questions. Are

Catherine Readby voicethere any questions of staff?

Thomas PetersonCouncil Member Peterson. Our Economic Development Director isn't here this evening, but based on a prior conversation, I'm suspecting that this is an area that would be included in her evaluation and assessment of this sector of the economy and the efforts that we are making to attract and retain these different segments combined. And so we would look forward to her being able to shed more light on this in the future. It's my impression that what we're doing here is a safe progression forward. However, obviously this is a key part of our economic development community and we want to be sensitive to that. Is that a fair characterization of where we are?

David Gellerpublic commentThat is correct.

Thomas PetersonThank you.

Catherine Readby voiceAny other questions? Is there a motion, Councilmember Hardy-Chandler?

Stacey Hardy-ChandlerNow, I move to adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 14, Businesses, Article 2, Licenses, Division 2, Classification of Certain Businesses of the Code of the City of Fairfax, Virginia, pertaining to a proposed increase in the levy and amount of annual license fees on certain business classifications. Second.

Catherine Readby voiceHardy Chandler and seconded by councilmember Peterson is there any discussion on the motion councilmember Hall

Stacy Hallthank you I know I'm the one who brought this up and I understand that we're meeting at point four five cents which is a five cent increase compared to what we had advertised which is an eight cent increase I do wish we had been able to meet up the middle of point 44 um and again like we're doing with the um the uh transient occupancy tax i would like to continue to monitor this and see how things go i also i mentioned this before but i want to have a conversation for the next budget cycle where we talk about the possible exemption of ten thousand dollars and see if there's a need to increase that and how that might impact things so thank you

Catherine Readby voiceany other discussion on this motion okay seeing none a roll call vote

Melissa Shinaberryclerkby voicecouncil member Amos aye council member Hall aye council member Hardy Chandler aye council member Peterson aye council member Bates

Billy Batesaye

Melissa Shinaberryclerkby voicecouncil member McQuillan aye motion passed unanimously we'll go to the last agenda item for tonight which is a consideration and appropriation of the FY 2027 budget and including all sub budgets contained therein together with the FY 2027 schedule of rates and levies the FY 2027 through 2031 capital improvement program and the establishment of the corresponding real estate tax rate and the personal property tax rates I'll recognize JC Martinez our assistant city manager and chief financial officer to provide the staff report

JC Martinezstaffthank you mayor council the attached package includes the staff recommendations recommended recommended procedures for one adoption of the FY 27 budget including the FY 27 schedule of rates and levies and the FY 27 through 31 capital improvement program to the establishment of the corresponding real estate and personal property tax rates and three the appropriation of all fy 27 budget funds

Catherine Readby voiceall right are there any questions of staff at this time no okay there are a series of motions the city council will walk through to consider the budget funds the rates and levies employee benefits and salary adjustments and set the real estate tax rate the personal property tax rates is there a motion to begin the budget adoption actions councilmember Hardy Chandler

Stacey Hardy-ChandlerI move to adopt the general fund capital fund wastewater fund stormwater utility fund cable grant fund old town service district fund transit fund transportation tax fund and debt service fund FY 2027 as presented by the city manager together with the proposed fy 2027 schedule of rates and levies the fy 2027 through 2031 capital improvement program the fy 2027 health benefit contribution rates attachment to a two percent market rate adjustment to general pay scales effective july 1 2026 a one percent cost of living adjustment cola for general employees effective july 1st 2026 a two percent cola for public safety employees effective july 1st 2026 a three percent salary adjustment increase effective january 1 2027 for eligible general skill employees and the

programmed annual step increase for public safety employees second the

Catherine Readby voicemotions been made by councilmember Hardy Chandler and seconded by councilmember Peterson before I ask for a roll call vote on the main motion are there any changes council would like to make to the budget adjustment sheet attachment one okay I call for a roll call vote to approve the budget mayor the budget yes

Speaker 9councilman yes mr. love command motion number two would be next motion

Catherine Readby voicenumber two

Speaker 9no vote on motion number one until we get a little farther along in the process

Catherine Readby voiceokay so motion number two

Stacey Hardy-Chandlercouncilmember I move to amend the main motion to incorporate all changes included in the budget amendment sheet attachment one.

Catherine Readby voiceIs there a second?

Thomas PetersonI'm not sure I quite understand.

JC Martinezstaffwas so councilmember this motion the second motion is to incorporate the changes that are listed as attachment one the budget adjustment sheets those are all the debits and the credits that were listed and that we previously discussed and that was sent out as well so now where the manager had proposed the original budget plus all the actions that we just took and incorporating the budget adjustment sheets that now sort of makes it one so

Thomas Petersonthis was not a motion to make any budget change no correct great thank you I'd like to second great

Catherine Readby voiceemotions been made by councilmember Hardy Chandler and seconded by council member Peterson is there any discussion on the motion council member Bates

Billy Batesjust one quick clarification the the motion that was read has a two percent public safety coal increase but the change sheet has a one percent so that's a one percent is that right

JC Martinezstaffabsolutely correct the managers proposed budget was a one percent council and deliberations and discussion wanted to add in an additional 1% so this combines both all

Billy Batesright yeah thank you

JC Martinezstaffsure

Catherine Readby voiceokay who am I recognizing councilmember McQuillan

Rachel McQuillenWhile I did not support the meals tax increase and voted against that specific measure, I will be supporting the budget tonight. And I want to explain why. This budget was not easy to build. For months, council, staff, partners, and residents, we worked through difficult conversations and priorities, needs, and costs. We reviewed this budget line by line, and we asked tough questions. We requested additional information. we challenged assumptions and we weighed every decision against one central question. How do we protect city services while also respecting the financial pressures our residents are already feeling? Because residents are feeling pressure. The cost of living in Northern Virginia continues to rise.

Housing costs are rising, food costs are rising, utilities and assessments are rising. We heard that clearly throughout this process and that really shaped our discussions every step of the way. Now no budget is perfect. There are components of this budget. including the meals tax increase but budgets are ultimately about balance. And what gives me confidence in supporting this budget tonight is the process we went through to get here. This council took the process seriously. We worked collaboratively, we debated openly, we spent long hours reviewing details and we remained focused on fiscal responsibility and long-term stability. I appreciate that this budget reflects the restraint. It continues

funding core services without expanding government staffing. It maintains the city's strongest financial position and it continues investing in the things residents consistently tell us matter most. Public safety, schools, infrastructure, parks, mobility, and reliable city services. Most importantly this budget keeps the city moving forward while maintaining financial stability and I think that matters. I also want to thank city staff and our finance team, our department directors, our school board partners, and the residents who participated throughout this process. Public engagement makes us better, and this budget is stronger because of that input. As we move forward, I look forward to continuing conversations about long-term sustainability,

operational efficiencies, and economic development, while protecting the level of service our community expects. For those reasons, I'll be supporting the adoption of this budget tonight. Thank you.

Catherine Readby voiceokay so there will be opportunities later on for any other comments people want to make there will be an opportunity for that at this time this is the opportunity for city council to make any motions to increase or decrease decrease any revenues or expenditures okay i call for a roll call vote to approve the budget adjustment sheet as amended by the city council incorporating making it part of the budget

Melissa Shinaberryclerkby voicecouncil member McQuillan aye council member Bates aye council member Peterson aye council member Hardy Chandler aye council member Hall aye council member Amos aye motion passed unanimously do

Catherine Readby voiceI have a motion to set the tax rates for personal property and real estate councilmember Hardy Chandler

Stacey Hardy-ChandlerI move to set the real estate tech the real estate as of January 1st, 2026 at $1.07.5 per $100 of assessed value.

Catherine Readby voiceSeven and a quarter. Seven and a quarter. Sorry.

Stacey Hardy-ChandlerApologies. 107.25 per $100 of assessed value. Set the personal property and machinery and tools tax rate effective as of January 1, 2026 at $4.13 per $100 assessed value based upon the assessment ratio of 100% of fair market value and set the personal property tax rate effective as of January 1st, 2026 at $0.01 per $100 assessed valuation for those members of volunteer fire departments or volunteer rescue squads qualifying under the city code. Second. A

Catherine Readby voicemotion has been made by Councilmember Hardy Chandler and seconded by Councilmember Peterson. Is there any discussion on the motion? Okay. I call for a roll call vote to adopt the real estate tax rate and the personal property tax rates.

Melissa Shinaberryclerkby voiceCouncilmember Amos?

Catherine Readby voiceAye.

Melissa Shinaberryclerkby voiceCouncilmember Hall? Aye. Councilmember Hardy Chandler? Aye. Councilmember Peterson? Aye. Councilmember Bates? Aye. Councilmember McQuillan? Aye. Motion passed unanimously.

Catherine Readby voiceWe will now move back to the main motion incorporating all of the budget actions up to this point. I call for a roll call vote to adopt the main motion adopting the overall budget, including the schedule of rates and levies, the FY 2027 to 2031 CIP, the FY 2027 health benefit contribution rates, attachment 2, and a 2% market rate adjustment to general pay scales effective July 1, 2026, and a 1% COLA for general employees effective July 1, 2026, and a 2% COLA for employees effective July 1 2026 a 3% salary adjustment increase effective January 1 2027 for eligible general scale employees and the programmed annual step increase for public safety employees council

Melissa Shinaberryclerkby voicemember McQuillan

Catherine Readby voiceI

Melissa Shinaberryclerkby voicecouncil member Bates I council member Peterson all right council member hardy-chandler council member hall hi council member amos hi motion passed unanimously the

Catherine Readby voicefinal action for council consideration is a set of appropriation resolutions for all of the budget funds do i have a motion to this effect council member hardy-chandler

Stacey Hardy-Chandleri move to approve the appreciate appropriation resolutions for the general capital wastewater transit stormwater utility cable old town transportation tax and debt service funds for the fiscal year beginning july 1 2026 reflecting all changes approved as part of the fy 2027 budget adoption immediately prior to this action

Thomas Petersonsecond a

Catherine Readby voicemotion's been made by council member hardy chandler and seconded by council member peterson is there any discussion on the final motion or final comments on the fy 2027 budget councilmember Hall

Stacy Hallthank you and I will provide these to the clerk since some of you might not be able to hear me can you hear me at all okay so tonight we'll adopt a city of Fairfax budget that reflects months of careful work collaboration and tough choices the city manager proposed a rate of 1.08 and the advertised rate was 1.095 but through continued effort we're bringing 725 this means a 462 dollar and 50 cent increase for the average priced home in the city this is 335 dollars in natural growth assessment and 127 dollars and 50 cents attributed to the tax rate increase i point this out because i think it's important to know how the numbers shake out um so this matters it shows we listened pushed for efficiencies and stayed focused on balancing

needs with affordability. This budget makes important investments in our people. It includes a 2% market rate adjustment, a 1% COLA for general employees, along with a 2% COLA for our public safety personnel beginning in July. It also provides a 3% salary adjustment for eligible employees in January and continues step increases for public safety staff. We're also increasing advanced life support pay for eligible fire personnel, recognizing the critical work they do every day to keep our community safe. At the same time, we're making long overdue updates to how we generate revenue. This includes adjustments to the business professional and occupational license tax, BPOL, which hasn't been updated in over 30 years. We're also adding one half percent

to the meals tax and increasing the transient occupancy tax from four percent to ten and a half percent. Both taxes are also paid by non-residents who use and benefit from our city. While I do not meals tax and wish we had found an alternate means i do understand it is needed to support a balanced budget our school tuition with fairfax county public schools continues to be one of the biggest challenges in our budget i will paraphrase the cfo from 2020 fiscal year 2023 to the fiscal 2026 estimate cost of increase by 17.4 million a 31.5 31.5 percent jump equivalent to about on the real estate tax rate looking ahead the fiscal year 2027 estimate is 76.4 million bringing that total increase to 21.1 million since fiscal year 2023 or 38.2 percent roughly 23.9

cents on the tax rate these are real costs that we are required to pay with limited input or oversight while we continue to look for efficiencies in other areas of the budget this remains a significant an ongoing driver and our investments in our students is not optional. This budget allows us to continue moving forward with school renovations while I remain hopeful that an additional 1% sales tax option will advance enrichment and give voters a chance to weigh in on this in November. The budget also restores funding to the Fairfax Renaissance Housing Program, provides a one-time grant to support Beacon Landing, and includes an important investment of wooded forests i also want to sincerely thank our staff for their tireless work throughout this

process developing the budget of this scale and complexity takes an enormous amount of time expertise and dedication i'm especially grateful to our city manager our chief financial officer our budget director and the entire budget team as well as staff across all departments who work diligently to provide the data analysis and transparency needed to help us make informed Is it perfect? No. But it reflects real progress. It's a balanced, thoughtful plan that supports our workforce, invests in our priorities, and respects the financial pressures our residents are facing. And I'm very proud of the work that got us here. Thank you.

Catherine Readby voiceCouncil Member Peterson?

Thomas PetersonThank you. I also would like to provide a brief statement, and I'll submit that to the city clerk later. and I am very pleased to support this budget agreement. I believe it reflects what our residents expect from us, careful stewardship, thoughtful decision-making, and a clear focus on both present needs and our long-term future. The budget demonstrates that we can meet the needs of our city while respecting the financial realities facing residents. The adopted real estate tax of 1.0725, It's $1.75 per hundred. Represents less than a two cent increase over last year and is more than two cents below the advertised rate of 1.095. That outcome reflects the work we have done together this year to identify efficiencies

and make more disciplined choices and it builds on the intensive work undertaken last year. I've consistently said that we shouldn't necessarily accept higher tax rates as a default. Instead, we should be doing the harder work of reviewing spending carefully, improving processes, and finding better solutions, including alternate sources of revenue. I believe this budget reflects that approach. At the same time, we are continuing to invest in what matters most for our community, public safety, education, environmental stewardship, energy cost control, support for seniors and vulnerable residences, targeted approaches to housing and protection of our city's character and quality of life. We're also making important improvements in how we govern.

This is the first budget built with a full year, a full five-year financial forecast, which will help ensure stability and avoid disruptive swings in the future. And just as importantly, this year's process has been more transparent, more collaborative, and more responsive than ever to our residents. The depth of insight and detail and budget questions and comments by citizens this year reflects that. I also want to thank our city manager, our chief financial officer, staff across all departments and the many residents who engaged in the process. Their work has made this a stronger budget and a better process. This is the kind of outcome we should continue to strive for, protecting affordability, strengthening our community,

acting as good stewards, and planning responsibly for the future. I'm proud to support this budget, and I look forward to continuing to work together. Thank you.

Catherine Readby voiceany other comments council member Bates

Billy BatesI just want to thank our staff for their hard work on this budget and I want to acknowledge that while certainly none of us love the idea of raising taxes and we certainly understand the difficulties that that can pose on the other hand you know a lot of our staff it would be very particularly early career staff and even first responders to live, you know, even within a half hour of where they work. And I think that this budget takes a very important step in the direction of making sure that our staff are taken care of and also importantly funds the paying classification study, which will look at the entire city. and it'll be incumbent on future councils to make sure that they're taking that in consideration

and taking a good hard look at how we're taking care of our staff and how we are compensating them and making sure that going forward we can all take pride in the fact that this is a city that values the work that our staff does. Thank you

Catherine Readby voiceAny other comments All right With that a roll call vote

Melissa Shinaberryclerkby voicecouncilmember Amos Hi councilmember Hall I councilmember Hardy. Hi councilmember Peterson. All right councilmember Bates. Hi councilmember McClellan. I motion passed unanimously

Catherine Readby voiceWith thanks to everyone staff and council for all the hard work. I now adjourn this meeting at 48 p.m. Thank you.