City Council Work Session
What was decided
- 2watch 2:40Consideration for remote participation by Councilmembers Amos pursuant to Code of Virginia Sec. 2.2-3708.3.
Councilmember Bates was absent.
Passed, unanimousNames Future Meeting Topics · read the transcript
- Remote Participation Policyin progressRemote participation by Councilmember Amos was approved unanimously under Code of Virginia Sec. 2.2-3708.3, with Councilmember Bates absent.
Presented
- 4aFuture Meeting Topics. · Discussed during work session. No formal action recorded.watch 3:56
Discussed for 22m · also names Special Use Permit ×3, Legislative Program ×2, Beacon Landing, Courthouse Plaza, Master Plan, Move Fairfax City · read the transcript
- Future Meeting TopicsFuture meeting topics were discussed during the work session; no formal action was recorded.
- 4bTransportation Project Update. · Staff report and presentation given during work session. No formal action recorded.watch 26:15
Until the next chapter, names Safety Action Plan ×4, Master Plan ×3, Engage Fairfax ×2, George Snyder Trail ×2, Paul VI ×2, Two-Year Transportation Program ×2 · read the transcript
- Transportation Project UpdateA staff report and presentation on the Transportation Project Update were delivered during the work session; no formal action was recorded.
- 7aDiscussion about Modification of the Residential Permit Parking District (RPPD) Ordinance. · Discussed during continued work session. No formal action recorded.
- Residential Permit Parking District (RPPD) Ordinancein progressPotential modifications to the RPPD Ordinance were discussed via staff report and presentation; no formal action was taken.
- 7bDiscussion on Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Urban Maintenance Payments. · Discussed during continued work session. No formal action recorded.
- Work Session Room 111The work session, including the VDOT Urban Maintenance Payments discussion, was held in Work Session Room 111.
- VDOT Urban Maintenance PaymentsVDOT Urban Maintenance Payments were discussed via staff report and presentation during the continued work session; no formal action was recorded.
- 7cDiscussion and update on potential amendments to the Zoning Ordinance related to adopted Small Area Plans. · Discussed during continued work session. No formal action recorded.watch 170:01
Discussed for 1h 32m · also names Special Exceptions ×7, City of Fairfax 2035 Comprehensive Plan ×5, The Botanist ×4, Davies Property ×3, Old Town Parking Study ×2, Special Use Permit ×2 · read the transcript
- Small Area Plansin progressPotential Zoning Ordinance amendments related to adopted Small Area Plans were discussed via staff report and presentation; no formal action was taken.
- 7dDiscussion of FY 2027 Fall Supplemental Appropriations. · Discussed during continued work session. No formal action recorded.watch 265:10
Discussed for 4m · also names General Fund ×3, Housing Trust Fund · read the transcript
- FY 2027 Fall Supplemental Appropriationsin progressFY 2027 Fall Supplemental Appropriations were discussed via staff report during the continued work session; no formal action was recorded.
Named in discussion
Tracked topics the transcript names that no agenda item is filed under. Their own pages and wikis do not yet record this meeting; the passages below are the only trace.
“…city manager. The current operation was enabled through a special use permit and special exceptions, and tied to those approvals are an operations plan, and they include hours of operation. at least Sundays are not included within the approved hours of…”
- Safety Action Plan5 passages, 4m
“…uh, we will be talking about the move Fairfax city pedestrian master plan and safety action plan and a discussion of potential future reviews and updates to the adopted small area plans. December 8th another very substantial meeting on consent the…”
“…PLANS WHEN WE REVIEW THEM. AND AS A REMINDER, THE SMALLER PLANS CAME OUT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHICH HAS IDENTIFIED ACTIVITY CENTERS AND BEFORE THAT IT WAS MIXED USE DISTRICTS. THEY HAVE BEEN IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOING BACK TO THE EARLY 2000s.…”
“…address it. I think he probably has better knowledge than I do. I think under the special use permit, it would require us to adjust that with council action.”
“…2032. At that meeting, uh, we will be talking about the move Fairfax city pedestrian master plan and safety action plan and a discussion of potential future reviews and updates to the adopted small area plans. December 8th another very substantial meeting on…”
- General Fund3 passages, 2m
“…that will be used to fund this trust fund. So that will be moved over on the general fund. The second piece is to create a school's fund separate from the general fund. What this will allow us to do is put our financial data in line between our…”
“draft, but still more than what was ultimately approved. The botanists currently under construction in North Facts, the proposed amendments would result in less density, maximum density than the previous draft, which is also less than what was approved. For…”
“…the Country Club Hills Connector, which was at concept design stage, and the George Snyder Trail, which was about to be awarded. So with a vote of four, four people can cancel any project, and with a vote of three, you can simply not appropriate the…”
- Move Fairfax City2 passages, 2m
“…um, draft CIP for 2028 to 2032. At that meeting, uh, we will be talking about the move Fairfax city pedestrian master plan and safety action plan and a discussion of potential future reviews and updates to the adopted small area plans. December 8th…”
“…one. This one is similar to Russ Westmore and that was previously approved in the two-year transportation program to go into this concept development phase. Similar in that this project is looking to connect or fill in the existing sidewalk gaps”
“…area of the city, in the northwest area, because there used to be, you'll remember, Paul VI High School used to be in this location. And so there was concerns about overflow parking from that high school when that was operating. So there's two districts in…”
“…component, and that is the one added density incentive that we have. And then the Davies property, this would result in less density than what was approved and less density from the previous draft.”